Re: review: FDW API

On 21.01.2011 17:57, Robert Haas wrote:
> How much review have you done of parts (3) and (4)?

Not much. I'm getting there..

> The key issue for
> all of the FDW work in progress seems to be what the handler API is
> going to look like, and so once we get that committed it will unblock
> a lot of other things.

Yep. The API that's there now was originally suggested by me, so I 
probably won't have big complaints about it. I'll have to also look at 
the PostgreSQL and file implementations of it to see that it really fits 
the bill.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com