Re: SSI and Hot Standby

On 20.01.2011 03:05, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> If we don't do something like this, do we just provide REPEATABLE
> READ on the standby as the strictest level of transaction isolation?
> If so, do we generate an error on a request for SERIALIZABLE, warn
> and provide degraded behavior, or just quietly give them REPEATABLE
> READ behavior?

+1 for generating an error.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com