Re: Confusing comment in TransactionIdIsInProgress
| От | Heikki Linnakangas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Confusing comment in TransactionIdIsInProgress |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4D3554A0.5040205@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Confusing comment in TransactionIdIsInProgress (Jim Nasby <jim@nasby.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Confusing comment in TransactionIdIsInProgress
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 18.01.2011 07:15, Jim Nasby wrote:
> Shouldn't the comment read "If first time through"?
>
> /*
> * If not first time through, get workspace to remember main XIDs in. We
> * malloc it permanently to avoid repeated palloc/pfree overhead.
> */
> if (xids == NULL)
> {
> ...
> xids = (TransactionId *) malloc(maxxids * sizeof(TransactionId));
Huh, yes, I'm amazed that no-one have noticed. I must've read that piece
of code dozens of times in the last couple of years myself, and that
sentence was even copy-pasted to GetConflictingVirtualXIDs() later in
that file, including that thinko.
Thanks, fixed both copies.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: