Em 14-01-2011 17:41, Jaime Casanova escreveu:
> Here is a patch that implements "named restore points".
>
Nice feature. I only read the provided documentation and it seems inconsistent
to allow name, time, and xid at recovery_target_name because (i) someone could
name the recovery point as '1234567' (xid) or '2011-01-14' (I use this format
a lot) and (ii) if the suffix name is *_name* it shouldn't allow xid and time.
IMHO, recovery_target_name should allow only names.
-- Euler Taveira de Oliveira http://www.timbira.com/