Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not wildly enthusiastic about breaking this with only one
> intervening release. We normally support deprecated syntax for
> quite a bit longer than that.
"one intervening release"? Where did you see that?
I thought we were just talking about deprecating the old syntax, not
breaking it. If history is any guide, getting the deprecation
mentioned in the docs now would lead to actual removal somewhere
around 10.0.
-Kevin