On 01/12/2011 10:16 PM, Guillaume Cottenceau wrote:
> What's your point and in what is it related to that ML?
Given the package names, I suspect this is a poorly-expressed complaint
about the performance of downloads from the pgdg/psqlrpms site. If that
was the original poster's intent, they would've been better served with
a post that included some minimal details like:
- Information abut their local connectivity
- mtr --report / traceroute output
- tests from other available hosts
If that wasn't the original poster's intent, perhaps it'd be worth a
second try to explain what they were *trying* to say? Was it just a joke
- 'cos if so, it was kinda flat.
--
Craig Ringer