Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers

Robert,

>> Unfortunately, we might still need a manual parameter for override
>> because of the interaction between wal_buffers and
>> synchronous_commit=off, since it sets the max size of the unflushed data
>> buffer.  Discuss?
> 
> Do we have any evidence there's actually a problem in that case, or
> that a larger value of wal_buffers solves it?  I mean, the background
> writer is going to start a background flush as quickly as it can...

I don't think anyone has done any testing.  However, the setting is
there and some users might be convinced that they need it.

>> And the "auto" setting should be -1, not 0kB.  We use -1 for "use
>> default" for several other GUCs.
> 
> No can do.  Gotta have things in the same units.

That's certainly not true with, for example, log_temp_files.

--                                  -- Josh Berkus                                    PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                        http://www.pgexperts.com