Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Really, the biggest risk of such a GUC is the confusion factor
>> when supporting people.
> How is this different from our other backwards-compatibility GUCs?
I thought Tom might be concerned about such a GUC destabilizing
things in other ways. I just wanted to make clear how unlikely that
was in this case. I agree that the risk of confusion in support is
always there with a backwards-compatibility GUC.
I'm still not taking a position either way on this, since I can see
the merit of both arguments and it has little impact on me,
personally. I'm just trying to be up-front about things so people
can make an informed decision.
-Kevin