> What about the HBA here?
Hmmm. That's tempting; an "synchronous" HBA instead of a GUC? But that
doesn't solve the problem of "standby #6 is failing, I want to kick it
off synch rep".
I'd be opposed to having a GUC *and* an HBA. making DBAs set things
independantly in two places just frustrates our users.
--Josh