On 2010-12-22 8:24 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On sön, 2010-11-14 at 04:45 +0200, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
>> .. and a wild patch appears.
>>
>> This is almost exactly the patch from 2010-02 without
>> CommandCounterIncrement()s. It's still a bit rough around the edges
>> and
>> needs some more comments, but I'm posting it here anyway.
>
> Is this the patch of record? There are no changes to the documentation
> included.
I've kept the documentation as a separate patch, but I haven't touched
it in a very long time. I will work on the documentation if there's a
chance of the patch getting accepted for 9.1. This arrangement makes
more sense to me and I'm sure others will agree.
Regards,
Marko Tiikkaja