On 16.12.2010 19:58, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
> <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> One more thing: the motivation behind this patch is to allow parallel
>> pg_dump in the future, so we should be make sure this patch caters well for
>> that.
>>
>> As soon as we have parallel pg_dump, the next big thing is going to be
>> parallel dump of the same table using multiple processes. Perhaps we should
>> prepare for that in the directory archive format, by allowing the data of a
>> single table to be split into multiple files. That way parallel pg_dump is
>> simple, you just split the table in chunks of roughly the same size, say
>> 10GB each, and launch a process for each chunk, writing to a separate file.
>>
>> It should be a quite simple add-on to the current patch, but will make life
>> so much easier for parallel pg_dump. It would also be helpful to work around
>> file size limitations on some filesystems.
>
> Sounds reasonable. Are you planning to do this and commit?
I'll defer to Joachim, assuming he has the time & energy.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com