On 12/07/2010 01:22 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
>>> However, if you were doing something like parallel pg_dump you could
>>> just run the parent and child instances all against the slave, so the
>>> pg_dump scenario doesn't seem to offer much of a supporting use-case for
>>> worrying about this. When would you really need to be able to do it?
>
>> If you had several standbys, you could distribute the work of the
>> pg_dump among them. This would be a huge speedup for a large database,
>> potentially, thanks to parallelization of I/O and network. Imagine
>> doing a pg_dump of a 300GB database in 10min.
>
> That does sound kind of attractive. But to do that I think we'd have to
> go with the pass-the-snapshot-through-the-client approach. Shipping
> internal snapshot files through the WAL stream doesn't seem attractive
> to me.
this kind of functionality would also be very useful/interesting for
connection poolers/loadbalancers that are trying to distribute load
across multiple hosts and could use that to at least give some sort of
consistency guarantee.
Stefan