Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andy Colson
Тема Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Дата
Msg-id 4CFD587E.8090008@squeakycode.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?  (Michael C Rosenstein <mcr@mdibl.org>)
Ответы Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?  (Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>)
Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-general
On 12/6/2010 3:30 PM, Michael C Rosenstein wrote:
> Here's a short overview of what Oracle synonyms provide:
> http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b28318/schema.htm#i5669
>
>
> /m
>

Hum... can we move away from what oracle supports?  Cuz PG is not going
to support anything like it.

And can we get away from oracle parlance?  Michael, can you tell us, in
PG terms, what you could have used.  (err, just saw your "example
webAppUser" above... which I think pretty much covers that, so never mind)

Can someone post what the synonyms will do?  And what will be synonym'able?

(cuz JD said: SYNONYMS work for things that aren't a table.
then tlg said: synonyms for non-table things was pretty much rejected.

so we got... nothing then?)

-Andy

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?
Следующее
От: Andy Colson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Do we want SYNONYMS?