On 03.12.2010 21:58, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Heikki Linnakangas's message of vie dic 03 16:45:59 -0300 2010:
>
>> ALTER TABLE table_name SET PRIMARY KEY USING INDEX index_name. Quite
>> verbose, but imho USING makes it much more clear that it's an existing
>> index.
>
> I was going to post the same thing (well except I was still thinking in
> ADD PRIMARY KEY rather than SET PRIMARY KEY). I think SET is better
> than ADD in that it is a bit different from the syntax that makes it
> create a new index. On the other hand, it could also be pointlessly
> annoying.
I think I'd prefer ADD too. I didn't pay attention to that when I posted.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com