Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Heikki Linnakangas
Тема Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump
Дата
Msg-id 4CF780B8.3060202@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump  (Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>)
Ответы Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump  (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>)
Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump  (Joachim Wieland <joe@mcknight.de>)
Re: WIP patch for parallel pg_dump  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 02.12.2010 07:39, Joachim Wieland wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Joachim Wieland<joe@mcknight.de>  wrote:
>> You would add a regular parallel dump with
>>
>> $ pg_dump -j 4 -Fd -f out.dir dbname
>
> So this is an updated series of patches for my parallel pg_dump WIP
> patch. Most importantly it now runs on Windows once you get it to
> compile there (I have added the new files to the respective project of
> Mkvcbuild.pm but I wondered why the other archive formats do not need
> to be defined in that file...).
>
> So far nobody has volunteered to review this patch. It would be great
> if people could at least check it out, run it and let me know if it
> works and if they have any comments.

That's a big patch..

I don't see the point of the sort-by-relpages code. The order the 
objects are dumped should be irrelevant, as long as you obey the 
restrictions dictated by dependencies. Or is it only needed for the 
multiple-target-dirs feature? Frankly I don't see the point of that, so 
it would be good to cull it out at least in this first stage.


--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_execute_from_file review
Следующее
От: Simon Riggs
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hot Standby: too many KnownAssignedXids