Re: crash-safe visibility map, take three

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Heikki Linnakangas
Тема Re: crash-safe visibility map, take three
Дата
Msg-id 4CF67B5C.9030003@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: crash-safe visibility map, take three  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: crash-safe visibility map, take three  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 01.12.2010 18:40, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas<robertmhaas@gmail.com>  writes:
>> As far as I can tell, there are basically two viable solutions on the
>> table here.
>
>> 1. Every time we observe a page as all-visible, (a) set the
>> PD_ALL_VISIBLE bit on the page, without bumping the LSN; (b) set the
>> bit in the visibility map page, bumping the LSN as usual, and (c) emit
>> a WAL record indicating the relation and block number.  On redo of
>> this record, set both the page-level bit and the visibility map bit.
>> The heap page may hit the disk before the WAL record, but that's OK;
>
> Um, no it isn't.  Suppose the heap page gets to disk but we crash before
> the WAL record does.  Now we have a persistent state where the heap page
> is marked PD_ALL_VISIBLE but the corresponding VM bit is not set.  The
> VM bit will never become set, either, because operations on the heap
> page will see PD_ALL_VISIBLE and assume it already is set.  This state
> of affairs might be acceptable from a correctness standpoint, but not
> from a performance standpoint.

The next vacuum will fix it. We already handle that. It's no different 
from the situation where neither change makes it to the disk.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: crash-safe visibility map, take three
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: crash-safe visibility map, take three