Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin Grittner
Тема Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)
Дата
Msg-id 4CE674D60200002500037C2E@gw.wicourts.gov
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> What you typically need is a guarantee about the order in which
> writes become visible.
> In some cases you also need to guarantee the order of reads.
Doesn't that suggest different primitives?
-Kevin

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)
Следующее
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die)