Re: unlogged tables
| От | Heikki Linnakangas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: unlogged tables |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4CE41FBB.6000006@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: unlogged tables (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: unlogged tables
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 17.11.2010 17:11, Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> fsync()ing the file at shutdown doesn't seem too bad to me from >> performance point of view, we tolerate that for all other tables. And >> you can always truncate the table yourself before shutdown. > > The objection to that was not about performance. It was about how > to find out what needs to be fsync'd. I must be missing something: we handle that just fine with normal tables, why is it a problem for unlogged tables? -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: