Re: Re: Rethinking hint bits WAS: Protecting against unexpected zero-pages: proposal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: Re: Rethinking hint bits WAS: Protecting against unexpected zero-pages: proposal
Дата
Msg-id 4CE06C97.8000407@dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Re: Rethinking hint bits WAS: Protecting against unexpected zero-pages: proposal  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers

On 11/14/2010 05:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh is ignoring the proposal that is on the table and seems actually
> workable, which is to consult the visibility map during index-only
> scans.  For mostly-static tables this would save trips to the heap for
> very little extra I/O.  The hard part is to make the VM reliable, but
> that is not obviously harder than making separately-stored hint bits
> reliable.

I thought we had agreement in the past that this was the way we should 
proceed.

cheers

andrew


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Count backend self-sync calls
Следующее
От: David Fetter
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: wCTE behaviour