Re: GIN vs. Partial Indexes

On 11/12/2010 01:11 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>> On 10/08/2010 02:44 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>>>   In any case, I would expect that GIN could actually do this quite
>>>>   efficiently.  What we'd probably want is a concept of a "null word",
>>>>   with empty indexable rows entered in the index as if they contained the
>>>>   null word.  So there'd be just one index entry with a posting list of
>>>>   however many such rows there are.
>> So, given the lack of objections to this idea, do we have a plan for
>> fixing GIN?
> Is this a TODO?

Yes.

cheers

andrew