On 11/06/10 6:27 PM, Rob Brown-Bayliss wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 1:06 PM, John R Pierce<pierce@hogranch.com> wrote:
>
>> how about if you do something like, SELECT * FROM SOME_TABLE INTO
>> SOME_OTHER_TABLE; which doesn't involve returning data?
> In this case the times are as close to equal as to make no difference,
> within a couple of ms of each other. About 300ms each.
k, so its definitely the data transmission thats hurting you.
you said downloads were fine. does that include downloads from this
specific server ?