plpgsql execute vs. SELECT ... INTO
| От | Andrew Dunstan |
|---|---|
| Тема | plpgsql execute vs. SELECT ... INTO |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4CD489FF.1000908@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответы |
Re: plpgsql execute vs. SELECT ... INTO
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
(Prompted by a puzzled user on IRC) Ten years ago, nearly, we made this commit <https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/8a2cdd77ad5c0a4f8902ea86d0377336e076abcb> (see what a good thing it is we carefully got all the history transferred to git?) The comment on the commit says: EXECUTE of a SELECT ... INTO now draws a 'not implemented' error, rather than executing the INTO clause with non-plpgsqlsemantics as it was doing for the last few weeks/months. This keeps our options open for making it do theright plpgsql-ish thing in future without creating a backwards compatibility problem. There is no loss of functionalitysince people can get the same behavior with CREATE TABLE AS. Do we really still need to keep out options open on this after all that time? cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: