Re: [PATCH] Revert default wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux 2.6.33+

> I think the original idea was that if you had a dedicated WAL drive then
> sync-on-write would be reasonable.  But that was a very long time ago
> and I'm not sure that the system's behavior is anything like what it was
> then; for that matter I'm not sure we had proof that it was an optimal
> choice even back then.  That's why I want to revisit the choice of
> default and not just go for "minimum" change.

What plaforms do we need to test to get a reasonable idea? Solaris,
FreeBSD, Windows?

--                                  -- Josh Berkus                                    PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                        http://www.pgexperts.com