Re: revision of todo: NULL for ROW variables

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Kevin Grittner
Тема Re: revision of todo: NULL for ROW variables
Дата
Msg-id 4CCEC0CD0200002500037078@gw.wicourts.gov
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: revision of todo: NULL for ROW variables  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Ответы Re: revision of todo: NULL for ROW variables  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> Seriously though, I think that we should stick as closely to the
> letter of the standard as possible here (or, if there is
> ambiguity, pick one reasonable interpretation). NULL semantics are
> confusing enough without everyone making their own subtle tweaks.
+1
If the standard behavior doesn't support all the functionality we
need, we should be looking at PostgreSQL extensions which do not
conflict with standard syntax.  Supporting standard syntax with
different semantics is evil.
-Kevin


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jeff Davis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: revision of todo: NULL for ROW variables
Следующее
От: Dimitri Fontaine
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Range Types, discrete and/or continuous