Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Heikki Linnakangas
Тема Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...
Дата
Msg-id 4CC8480C.409@enterprisedb.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...  (Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>)
Ответы Re: plan time of MASSIVE partitioning ...  (Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 26.10.2010 18:34, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> thank you very much for pointing me to dynahash, here is the
> next version that finally seems to work.
>
> Two patches are attached, the first is the absolute minimum for
> making it work, this still has the Tree type for canon_pathkeys
> and eq_classes got the same treatment as join_rel_list/join_rel_hash
> has in the current sources: if the list grows larger than 32, a hash table
> is created. It seems to be be enough for doing in for
>       get_eclass_for_sort_expr()
> only, the other users of eq_classes aren't bothered by this change.

That's better, but can't you use dynahash for canon_pathkeys as well?


--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Aidan Van Dyk
Дата:
Сообщение: Bikeshedding on enum vocabulary
Следующее
От: "David E. Wheeler"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: add label to enum syntax