Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Mladen Gogala
Тема Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle
Дата
Msg-id 4CC741FF.8050709@vmsinfo.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Postgres insert performance and storage requirement compared to Oracle  (Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql@jamponi.net>)
Список pgsql-performance
On 10/26/2010 11:41 AM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> yup, that's exactly what I mean -- this will give you more uniform
> insert performance (your temp table doesn't even need indexes).  Every
> N records (say 10000) you send to permanent and truncate the temp
> table.  Obviously, this is more fragile approach so weigh the
> pros/cons carefully.
>
> merlin

Truncate temporary table? What a horrible advice! All that you need is
the temporary table to delete rows on commit.

--

Mladen Gogala
Sr. Oracle DBA
1500 Broadway
New York, NY 10036
(212) 329-5251
http://www.vmsinfo.com
The Leader in Integrated Media Intelligence Solutions




В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CPUs for new databases
Следующее
От: André Volpato
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: AIX slow buffer reads