> I think that that would probably involve a whole lot more notational
> busywork than just replacing typmod with something more complicated.
> However, we're talking about breaking vast amounts of code in either
> case, so maybe making it even vaster isn't a real consideration.
Gods, yes. Please let's not extend typemod any further without an overhaul.
-- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com