On 24/09/10 06:26, Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Robert Haas<robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think we need to further discuss how this is eventually going to get
>> integrated with the query planner and the executor before we commit
>> anything. The syntax support by itself is quite trivial.
>
> There are no active discussions :-( I think the author tried his best, so if
> other developers think it's a bad design, alternate plan must be proposed.
It's not that the design is bad, it's that it's non-existent. I haven't
seen any design on how this integrates with the planner.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com