Re: Git conversion status

On 09/22/2010 04:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>   (In particular, I'm avoiding Andrew's preferred alternative with the
> extra local repository; I don't want an asynchronous buffer between me
> and the real repository.  I guess if you had a really bad network
> connection it could be useful, but considering how much better this is
> than CVS already, I won't miss whatever savings that might offer.)

Oh, yes, the network saving is enormous. What I suggested is much more 
economical of disk space, though (it's the recommended way to set up the 
buildfarm for that reason). But maybe that doesn't matter too much to you.

cheers

andrew