Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there?
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4C99205B.2050409@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there? (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there?
Re: Any reason why the default_with_oids GUC is still there? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/20/10 10:59 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 21/09/10 04:18, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> ... or did we just forget to remove it?
>
> Backwards-compatibility? ;-) There hasn't been any pressing reason to
> remove it.
Any application which needed it (like OpenACS) just got broken when we
removed add_missing_from. Let alone the typecasting changes in 8.3.
Personally, I find removing GUCS to be a worthwhile goal in itself. We
have well over 200 now.
-- -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: