Re: pg_ctl emits strange warning message
| От | Heikki Linnakangas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_ctl emits strange warning message |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4C8E44B7.2010608@enterprisedb.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_ctl emits strange warning message (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_ctl emits strange warning message
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 13/09/10 18:19, Tom Lane wrote: > Heikki Linnakangas<heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes: >> Yet another idea: Check in pg_ctl if recovery.conf is also present. If >> it is, assume we're in recovery and don't print that warning. That would >> be dead simple. > > +1. This sounds like a much more appropriate approach. Hmm, looking at this more closely, I'm a bit confused. We already rename away backup_label at the beginning of recovery. Under what circumstances do we have a problem? This starts to seem like a complete non-issue to me. -- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: