On 09/08/2010 10:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
>> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié sep 08 12:12:31 -0400 2010:
>>> AFAIR it doesn't keep the first snapshot around. If it did, most of
>>> your work on snapshot list trimming would have been useless, no?
>
>> That's my point precisely. The name "IsolationUsesXactSnapshot" makes
>> it sound like it applies to any transaction that uses snapshots for
>> isolation, doesn't it?
>
> I don't think so, at least not when compared to the alternative
> IsolationUsesStmtSnapshot.
The attached patch is updated for the various comments, as well as some
wording tweaks by me. If there are no objections I'd like to commit this
in a day or two.
Joe
--
Joe Conway
credativ LLC: http://www.credativ.us
Linux, PostgreSQL, and general Open Source
Training, Service, Consulting, & 24x7 Support