On 09/08/2010 12:04 PM, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> Then there is no use to implement individual sync/async
> replicated transactions, period.
I disagree. Different transactions have different priorities for latency
vs. failure-resistance.
> An async replicated transaction
> that waits for a sync replicated transaction because of locks
> will become implicitely sync.
Sure. But how often do your transactions wait for another one because of
locks? What do we have MVCC for?
Regards
Markus Wanner