Re: SGML on functions
От
Kevin Grittner
Тема
Re: SGML on functions
Дата
Msg-id
4C7A34C70200002500034DB5@gw.wicourts.gov
Ответ на
Re: SGML on functions (Alvaro Herrera)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
SGML on functions Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
Re: SGML on functions Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
Re: SGML on functions "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: SGML on functions Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
Re: SGML on functions "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Re: SGML on functions Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: SGML on functions Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
Re: SGML on functions Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: SGML on functions Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
Re: SGML on functions Thom Brown <thom@linux.com>
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Thom Brown's message:
>> variance(> class="parameter">expression)
>>
>> vs
>>
>> stddev_samp(> class="parameter">expression)
>>
>> Which way is correct?
>
> The latter I think -- see
> http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/function.html
> (but perhaps search the actual standard)
Nothing I saw at that link suggests that the parameters should be
included within the scope. If you follow links from
there to here:
http://www.docbook.org/tdg/en/html/funcsynopsis.html
You find examples like this:
void qsort
void *dataptr[]
int left
int right
int (* comp)
void *, void *
-Kevin
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления