On 06/08/10 20:55, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On fre, 2010-08-06 at 09:04 +0100, Mike Fowler wrote:
>> If the patch is to be committed, does it make sense for me to refine
>> it such that it uses the new xpath internal function you extracted in
>> the xmlexists patch?
>
> Yes, you can probably shrink this patch down to about 20 lines.
>
Updated the patch so that it will apply to head and re-worked the
function to use the new xpath internal function.
Regards,
--
Mike Fowler
Registered Linux user: 379787