Re: merge command - GSoC progress

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Smith
Тема Re: merge command - GSoC progress
Дата
Msg-id 4C58A3E9.5080408@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: merge command - GSoC progress  (Boxuan Zhai <bxzhai2010@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: merge command - GSoC progress  (Boxuan Zhai <bxzhai2010@gmail.com>)
Re: merge command - GSoC progress  (Boxuan Zhai <bxzhai2010@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Boxuan Zhai wrote:
> I think there are no redundant lines in this time's patch file.

It is much better.  There are still more blank likes around the new code 
you've added than are needed in many places, but that doesn't interfere 
with reading the patch.

The main code formatting issue left you'll need to address eventually 
are all the really long comments in there.


> And, I have tested the running of MERGE command with different 
> situations. I am sorry that I didn't create regression test files, 
> because I am not sure how to add new files in the git package.

git add <filename> ?

The tests you've put in there are the right general sort of things to 
try out.  The one example you gave does show an UPSERT being emulated by 
MERGE, which is the #1 thing people are looking for initially.

-- 
Greg Smith  2ndQuadrant US  Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com   www.2ndQuadrant.us



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: reducing NUMERIC size for 9.1, take two
Следующее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Develop item from TODO list