Re: standard_conforming_strings

On 14/07/10 15:48, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 10:02 PM, Josh Berkus<josh@agliodbs.com>  wrote:
>>> An actual plan here might look like "let's flip it before 9.1alpha1
>>> so we can get some alpha testing cycles on it" ...
>>
>> "Hey, let's flip it in 9.1 CF 1, so that we can have some alpha testing
>> cycles on it."
>
> Should we do this?  Patch attached.

Any reason not to add a line to the 9.0 docs/release notes saying 
"WARNING: The PGDG currently plan to change this setting's default in 9.1"?

--   Richard Huxton  Archonet Ltd