Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers
Дата
Msg-id 4C12B5BA.10803@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Proposal for 9.1: WAL streaming from WAL buffers  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Well, we're already not waiting for fsync, which is the slowest part.
> If there's a performance problem, it may be because FADVISE_DONTNEED
> disables kernel buffering so that we're forced to actually read the data
> back from disk before sending it on down the wire.

Well, that's fairly direct to solve, no?  Just disable FADVISE_DONTNEED
if walsenders > 0.

--                                  -- Josh Berkus                                    PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                        http://www.pgexperts.com
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Следующее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: The smallest patch (vacuumdb.c)