Re: SR slaves and .pgpass

On 09/06/10 08:24, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Andrew Dunstan<andrew@dunslane.net>  wrote:
>> There is precedent for .pgpass being a bit ambiguous. See the way
>> "localhost" is used.
>
> OK. The attached patch allows us to use "replication" in the database
> field of the .pgpass file, for the replication connection.

Thanks, committed with some rewording of the docs and comments. I hope I 
made them better, not worse.

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com