Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature

On 27/05/10 10:49, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On tor, 2010-05-27 at 04:06 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> On 27/05/10 03:57, Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Being compatible with the SQL
>>> standard and with Oracle is not to be taken lightly.
>>
>> I seem to be alone believing that the SQL standard doesn't say anything
>> about named function parameters. Can someone point me to the relevant
>> section of the standard?
>
> It will be in SQL:2011.

Does it mandate => ?

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com