Re: functional call named notation clashes with SQL feature

On 27/05/10 03:57, Robert Haas wrote:
> Being compatible with the SQL
> standard and with Oracle is not to be taken lightly.

I seem to be alone believing that the SQL standard doesn't say anything 
about named function parameters. Can someone point me to the relevant 
section of the standard?

As evidence to the contrary:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-08/msg00558.php

--   Heikki Linnakangas  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com