Re: psql or pgbouncer bug?
| От | Jakub Ouhrabka |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: psql or pgbouncer bug? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 4BFA302E.8020802@comgate.cz обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: psql or pgbouncer bug? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: psql or pgbouncer bug?
Re: psql or pgbouncer bug? Re: psql or pgbouncer bug? |
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
> The auto-reconnect behavior is long-established and desirable. What's > not desirable is continuing with any statements remaining on the same > line, I think. We need to flush the input buffer on reconnect. So if I understand it correctly, if I need correct transaction behaviour in psql even in case of disconnection the only safe way is to use one statement per line. Is this correct? Thanks, Kuba
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: