Re: psql or pgbouncer bug?
От | Tom Molesworth |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql or pgbouncer bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 4BF7E931.40008@audioboundary.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | psql or pgbouncer bug? (Jakub Ouhrabka <kuba@comgate.cz>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql or pgbouncer bug?
Re: psql or pgbouncer bug? |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Hi Jakub, On 21/05/10 16:19, Jakub Ouhrabka wrote: > can anyone tell me how this could happen, please? > > database=# begin; update table set col = 100; > server closed the connection unexpectedly > This probably means the server terminated abnormally > before or while processing the request. > The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Succeeded. > UPDATE 153 > database=# ROLLBACK ; > WARNING: there is no transaction in progress > ROLLBACK I don't know anything about psql internals, but at a guess the sequence is this: * 'begin' is sent to server * Connection is dropped * Connection is reset, but 'begin' is not resent * Next statement (the update) is sent to the server, executes immediately * Rollback gives error since there was no corresponding begin Seems to be trivially easy to reproduce by connecting via psql, then killing that connection before issuing the 'begin; update' sequence (against postgres directly, no pgbouncer needed). If anything, it's an issue with psql settings? Maybe it should stop on connection drop rather than attempting reconnect and continuing with further statements. Tom
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: