Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>>>> Eventually the idea would be to have the build farm run such tests (with
>>>> a properly created dump file) so we can learn quickly if the backend
>>>> data format is changed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> If we're thinking of doing that, it would be better to back-patch the
>>> change that allowed '3'.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Yeah.
>>
>> It's going to require some fancy dancing to get the buildfarm to do it.
>> Each buildfarm run is for a specific branch, and all the built artefacts
>> are normally thrown away. I'd have to work out a way of stashing the
>> binaries from a build on one branch for use in the pg_upgrade tests in
>> the run on another branch. It's doable but could get messy.
>>
>
> Uh, that is not actually a problem. You just need to set
> extra_float_digits=-3 to create the dump file, which is only done once
> for each major version. You can _load_ that dump file into an
> unmodified old cluster and test just fine. I will write up some
> instructions in the next few days.
>
>
You are missing the point I was making. A buildfarm run does not
normally have available to it any binaries for a version other that the
one it is building. There is no notion of a multi-branch buildfarm run.
Each run is for a particular branch and is a separate miracle. So I'm
not concerned about the structure of the dump file but about what will
be used to load it into an old cluster during a buildfarm run.
cheers
andrew