Re: 8K recordsize bad on ZFS?

Ivan,

> Other things could have influenced your result - 260 MB/s vs 300 MB/s is
> close enough to be influenced by data position on (some of) the drives.
> (I'm not saying anything about the original question.)

You misread my post.  It's *87mb/s* vs. 300mb/s.  I kinda doubt that's
position on the drive.

--
                                  -- Josh Berkus
                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                                     http://www.pgexperts.com