Re: 8K recordsize bad on ZFS?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: 8K recordsize bad on ZFS?
Дата
Msg-id 4BE852CE.9020802@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: 8K recordsize bad on ZFS?  (Dimitri <dimitrik.fr@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: 8K recordsize bad on ZFS?
Re: 8K recordsize bad on ZFS?
Список pgsql-performance
On 5/9/10 1:45 AM, Dimitri wrote:
> Josh,
>
> it'll be great if you explain how did you change the records size to
> 128K? - as this size is assigned on the file creation and cannot be
> changed later - I suppose that you made a backup of your data and then
> process a full restore.. is it so?

You can change the recordsize of the zpool dynamically, then simply copy
the data directory (with PostgreSQL shut down) to a new directory on
that zpool.  This assumes that you have enough space on the zpool, of
course.

We didn't test how it would work to let the files in the Postgres
instance get gradually replaced by "natural" updating.

--
                                  -- Josh Berkus
                                     PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
                                     http://www.pgexperts.com

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Scott Marlowe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Dell Perc HX00 RAID controllers: What's inside?
Следующее
От: Ivan Voras
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 8K recordsize bad on ZFS?