Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Greg Smith
Тема Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server
Дата
Msg-id 4BDCB669.6090201@2ndquadrant.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server  (Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@killerbytes.com>)
Ответы Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server  (Scott Ribe <scott_ribe@killerbytes.com>)
Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server  (Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-general
Scott Ribe wrote:
> PG's locking scheme, MVCC, basically precludes certain specific optimizations that means a small number of very
specificqueries don't perform as well, while at the same time it means that throughput with multiple simultaneous
connectionsscales extremely well with multiple processors. 
>

SQL Server uses MVCC too as of their 2005 release, implemented with row
versioning similarly to Postgres.  The main non-MVCC holdout at this
point is DB2.

--
Greg Smith  2ndQuadrant US  Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com   www.2ndQuadrant.us


В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Scott Ribe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server
Следующее
От: Scott Ribe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Microsoft SQL server