Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com> wrote:
> As I said earlier you need to check SQLException.getSQLState, not
> getErrorCode.
Why anyone would want to use error code instead of SQLSTATE is
beyond me, but since they're out there, perhaps we should implement
getErrorCode to interpret SQLSTATE as a base 36 number, and return
that number? It might take less time than fielding the next
complaint. ;-)
If that sounds good, I could whip together a patch for it.
The biggest down side is that we'd have to document it....
-Kevin