Vincenzo Romano wrote:
> While I can agree that "Enterprise grade" is a buzzword, it does mean
> something: "very large amount of data" among other.
>
http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/Bitten_by_the_Enterprise_Bug.aspx
It's quite straighforward to get PostgreSQL up and running with many
terabytes of data, so long as you respect the design trade-offs in some
options. What you can't do is say those are wrong and reject
alternative implementation suggestions just because they're not
"enterprise". Whenever anyone uses that word at me, I mentally replace
it with "super duper", and
> There's no "fundamentally good design", but only a design which takes
> limitations and constraints into account.
>
You mean like taking into account the fact that partitioning performance
has an unavoidable trade-off, where you have to balance the query
optimizer overhead of supporting many partitions against the improvement
from splitting data into smaller pieces?
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg@2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us