On 4/27/10 2:47 PM, Chris Browne wrote:
> jd@commandprompt.com ("Joshua D. Drake") writes:
>>> * The DO() statement, allowing users to execute ad-hoc procedural statements
>> DO() support, allowing for inline? execution of procedural statements.
>>
>> Not quite sure about this one. I don't like the word ad-hoc. Dynamic?
>
> Hmm. How about...
>
> DO() enables users to execute procedural statements without requiring
> assigning function names.
>
> That's clearer, though a bit wordier.
I'd really prefer something that fits into a bullet without wrapping.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com